![]() The organization system is not as ideal despite being so speedy. Requires switching between Lightroom Classic for more advanced editing. ![]() Cons Expensive monthly subscription cost. Plugins aid in speeding up the output process. The tools work incredibly fast for being a series of sliders. Most editing applications I've tried get discarded quickly, but I think Darktable has potential for future use on at least some images. Pros Incredibly intuitive interface and workflow. This morning I promoted Darktable from the gaming/testing boot drive to the primary boot drive. I'm hoping it will serve for several years at least. I now find it a lot more intuitive compared to RawTherapee, but there are some Modules that are not active by default. Amazed how clean it renders RAW files But you are right about 'not for beginners' to a point. Darktable is a very powerful editing suit, but not for beginners. That's a powerful machine, so if speed were an issue, it'd be software-, not hardware-related.Īs gaming-capable PCs go, it's nothing special in most ways, but for still-photo purposes it has been plenty fast enough for my needs. darktable noise reduction / softproofing. ![]() When I get around to it, I'll examine its performance characteristics in more detail. I find it quite fast on my i7-7800X, 32GB, GTX1080 Ti, SSD system so far, but I haven't done anything I'd expect to be very demanding. I would be happy to switch back to Linux (Mint is the current hype distro, right ?) if it was more efficient. Is it because of the Windows thing ? Short story : years ago, I switched from Linux to Windows approximately only for photo editing sofware, and it was globally (exept for photo editing) a huge regression. As an unabashed pixel-peeper, that is a priority of mine.īesides, it lags on my i5 (3.6GHz) + 16GB and a Radeon R9 3Gb + SSD. I'd be veryinterested in what settings you'd recommend to maximize micro detail, right down to the individual pixel level. ![]() PRIME and lens corrections are definitely a win for DxO, but for micro detail dt is better for my cameras (that's a caveat that gets frequently overlooked). I compared the two in another thread, but everybody has different requirements. I doubt if it can actually replace DxO PhotoLab in my standard workflow, but I'm trying it with some unusually difficult images with the idea of using it for specific purposes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |